Thanks.  I’ve accepted the slides in the system, and updated the agenda.

> On 5 Nov 2024, at 10:11, Liuchunchi(Peter) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thank you! I attached it in the email, and also proposed the slides in the 
> system.
>  
> See you Wednesday :-)
> P
> From: Yoav Nir <[email protected]> 
> Sent: 2024年11月4日 20:31
> To: Liuchunchi(Peter) <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; <acme-chairs@ietf. org> <[email protected]>; Mike 
> Ounsworth <[email protected]>; Thomas Fossati <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Timeslot at dublin for acme-rats-00
>  
> Sure. We’ll add it to the agenda.  
>  
> Just please send slides tomorrow (Tuesday)
> 
> 
> On 3 Nov 2024, at 17:42, Liuchunchi(Peter) 
> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> Hi chairs, 
>  
> Just saw the posted 121 acme agenda, can’t help but notice that we have a 1.5 
> hour session but only a 1 hour agenda. Can I make use of the additional time 
> to share draft-liu-acme-rats-00?  :)
>  
> •      Draft(s) to be presented: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-acme-rats/
> •      Presenter’s name and email: Chunchi Peter Liu, [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> •      Desired duration: 15 minutes
> •      Whether presenter will be local or remote: local
>  
> A very short introduction about this new draft:
> “This document provides a means that allows an ACME server to test if an ACME 
> client possess a valid remote attestation result before issuing a certificate 
> to it.”
>  
> PCL
>  
> <[acme] acme rats.pptx>

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to