Hi Michael Richardson, Would you be willing to share some of your concerns on the draft? We would like to be proactive and begin addressing your feedback as opposed to waiting for the adoption call to come up. If it's easier, I could probably jump on a call to better understand your position.
Best, Henry On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 5:23 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > Mike Ounsworth <ounsworth+i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We currently have an ongoing CfA for > > draft-wendt-acme-authority-token-jwtclaimcon, > > and I am expecting that we will start a WGLC for > > draft-iet-acme-device-attest within the next few days. Both of those > > I posted comments about token-jwtclaimcon already. > I didn't wait for the adoption call to comment on device-attest. > > I read acme-dns-persist this week, but I guess I dcided to wait for the > actual adoption call. While I think it's actually the simplest of the > three, > I also have to the most concerns with it. > > remember that calls for adoption are an informal tradition, not specified > by > any process document. Adoption is at the whim of WG chairs. > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org
