Hello, I support adoption of this draft by ACME. We've got some working implementations and there are concrete use cases that would imminently make use of this work. We heard a bit about that during the ACME WG session in Montreal, and I think we'll hear a bit more here in this thread.
I wrote a bunch of this document and will continue to contribute reviews and changes. Additionally, we will maintain our implementation <https://github.com/abetterinternet/oidf-box> of this challenge type throughout development of the document. Thanks, Tim On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Mike Ounsworth via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > > Subject: Call for adoption: draft-demarco-acme-openid-federation-01 (Ends > 2025-12-10) > > This message starts a 2-week Call for Adoption for this document. > > Abstract: > The Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) protocol > allows server operators to obtain TLS certificates for their > websites, based on a demonstration of control over the website's > domain via a fully-automated challenge/response protocol. > > OpenID Federation 1.0 defines how to build a trust infrastructure > using a trusted third-party model. It uses a trust evaluation > mechanism to attest to the possession of private keys, protocol > specific metadata and miscellaneous administrative and technical > information related to a specific entity. > > This document defines how X.509 certificates associated with a given > OpenID Federation Entity can be issued by an X.509 Certification > Authority through the ACME protocol to the organizations which are > part of a federation built on top of OpenID Federation 1.0. > > File can be retrieved from: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-demarco-acme-openid-federation/ > > Please reply to this message keeping [email protected] in copy by indicating > whether you support or not the adoption of this draft as a WG document. > Comments to motivate your preference are highly appreciated. > > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the > provisions > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be > found at [3]. > > Thank you. > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
