This erratum appears to be spam. The "original text" appears nowhere in the RFC in question.
Aaron On Sun, Mar 1, 2026 at 5:52 AM RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8657, > "Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Record Extensions for Account > URI and Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Method Binding". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8792 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: PR <[email protected]> > > Section: 1 > > Original Text > ------------- > Old English > > Corrected Text > -------------- > English > > Notes > ----- > NA > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8657 (draft-ietf-acme-caa-10) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Record > Extensions for Account URI and Automatic Certificate Management Environment > (ACME) Method Binding > Publication Date : November 2019 > Author(s) : H. Landau > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Automated Certificate Management Environment > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
