Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: 2.6.14-1.1653 has ``empty'' pci bus


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175814


acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|intel-linux-                |acpi-
                   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]        |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                   |                            |et




------- Additional Comments From acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net  
2006-01-17 23:58 EST -------
Re: 600X
Different bug report, but the cause is probably that
FC is currently built with CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
which enables ACPI for all systems that claim to support it.
when previously the 600X was deemed too old to run ACPI.
Somebody just donated a 600X to me and it fails for me too
so maybe we'll be able to address that one in particular.

Re: SMP PIII
Does this still fail?
If so, is "pci=noacpi" sufficient to workaround the failure?
Please attach the output of "dmesg -s64000" of a successful boot,
and also if you can capture the serial "debug" console of
a failed boot.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to