http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6251
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |acpi- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |et Owner|acpi_power-sleep- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Summary|entering/exiting suspend-to-|ec_intr=0 needed to prevent |ram produces annoying beeps |S3 beeps - ThinkPad X20 |on a ThinkPad X20 | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-22 19:05 ------- Please verify that I understand this properly: 1. 2.6.15-suspend2 -- does this include the suspend2 patch? 2. 2.6.15-suspend2 already had a broken EC, and got: > ACPI-0508: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SI_._SST] (Node d3fc1300), AE_TIME the default for 2.6.15 was ec_burst=0, does this behaviour change with 2.6.15 if you use ec_burst=1 (expect beep to start happening, but maybe not) 3. 2.6.16 with default ec_intr=1 you get a beep with ec_intr=0, beep goes away, but you get an additional delay. So it looks like the EC may be broken in all 4 cases, just that it was first noticed and reported when the failure caused noise. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla