http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-03-26 21:07 -------
Okay, I first merged the acpi_in_suspend changes from before with the
Debug and I2RBcopy changes to the DSDT (which still has only THM0 in
it).  Then I put in your latest two changes, but booting gives:

Freeing unused kernel memory: 228k freed
FATAL: kernel too old
kernel panic not syncing: Attempted to kill init!

================== change 1 ============================

  change 2. in acpi_pm_finish:
  Right after: 
          arg.integer.value = ACPI_SST_WORKING;
          status = acpi_evaluate_object (NULL, METHOD_NAME__SST, &arg_list, 
NULL);
          if (ACPI_FAILURE (status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
                  ACPI_REPORT_ERROR (("Method _SST failed, %s\n",
                          acpi_format_exception (status)));
          }
  insert: acpi_in_suspend =NO

That code didn't appear in acpi_pm_finish (in sleep/main.c), but a close
relative of it appeared at the end of acpi_leave_sleep_state (in
hardware/hwsleep.c).  So, in acpi_pm_finish, I moved the
acpi_in_suspend = FALSE line to come after apci_leave_sleep_state
returns.  I'm using 2.6.16-rc5; are you using 2.6.16?  Anyway here's
what acpi_pm_finish now looks like:

static int acpi_pm_finish(suspend_state_t pm_state)
{
        u32 acpi_state = acpi_suspend_states[pm_state];

        acpi_leave_sleep_state(acpi_state);
        acpi_in_suspend = FALSE;   /* used to be one line above */
        acpi_disable_wakeup_device(acpi_state);

        /* reset firmware waking vector */
        acpi_set_firmware_waking_vector((acpi_physical_address) 0);

        if (init_8259A_after_S1) {
                printk("Broken toshiba laptop -> kicking interrupts\n");
                init_8259A(0);
        }
        return 0;
}


====================== change 2 ============================

  6. in acpi_thermal_check,
  just before: acpi_thermal_get_temperature(tz)
    insert: 
  if (acpi_in_suspend == YES)
    return_VOID;

I made that change too.

============================================================

For completeness, here's the diff between the vanilla kernel and the one
I just tried (let me know if I should also attach it at the bugzilla),
except I haven't included the modified DSDT:

diff -r ac486e270597 -r 9b6b830abe8f .config
--- a/.config   Sat Mar 18 08:35:34 2006 -0500
+++ b/.config   Sun Mar 26 23:06:16 2006 -0500
@@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
 # CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set
 CONFIG_ACPI_IBM=m
 # CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA is not set
-# CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT is not set
+CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT=y
+CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE="../../dsdt/600x.hex"
 CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
 CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y
 CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
diff -r ac486e270597 -r 9b6b830abe8f drivers/acpi/ec.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c Sat Mar 18 08:35:34 2006 -0500
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c Sun Mar 26 23:06:16 2006 -0500
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_intr_read(union acpi_
        acpi_hw_low_level_read(8, data, &ec->common.data_addr);
        ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Read [%02x] from address [%02x]\n",
                          *data, address));
+       acpi_os_sleep (1);
 
       end:
        up(&ec->intr.sem);
@@ -506,6 +507,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_intr_write(union acpi
 
        ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Wrote [%02x] to address [%02x]\n",
                          data, address));
+       acpi_os_sleep (1);
 
        up(&ec->intr.sem);
 
diff -r ac486e270597 -r 9b6b830abe8f drivers/acpi/osl.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c        Sat Mar 18 08:35:34 2006 -0500
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c        Sun Mar 26 23:06:16 2006 -0500
@@ -634,6 +634,8 @@ static void acpi_os_execute_deferred(voi
        return_VOID;
 }
 
+extern int acpi_in_suspend;
+
 acpi_status
 acpi_os_queue_for_execution(u32 priority,
                            acpi_osd_exec_callback function, void *context)
@@ -643,6 +645,9 @@ acpi_os_queue_for_execution(u32 priority
        struct work_struct *task;
 
        ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("os_queue_for_execution");
+       if (acpi_in_suspend)    /* in case kacpid is causing the queue */
+               /* should use a better error code, but oh well */
+         return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK);
 
        ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_EXEC,
                          "Scheduling function [%p(%p)] for deferred 
execution.\n",
diff -r ac486e270597 -r 9b6b830abe8f drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c Sat Mar 18 08:35:34 2006 -0500
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c Sun Mar 26 23:06:16 2006 -0500
@@ -19,6 +19,12 @@
 #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
 #include "sleep.h"
 
+/* for functions putting machine to sleep to know that we're
+   suspending, so that they can careful about what AML methods they
+   invoke (to avoid trying untested BIOS code paths) */
+int acpi_in_suspend;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_in_suspend);
+
 u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
 
 static struct pm_ops acpi_pm_ops;
@@ -55,6 +61,8 @@ static int acpi_pm_prepare(suspend_state
                printk("acpi_pm_prepare does not support %d \n", pm_state);
                return -EPERM;
        }
+       acpi_os_wait_events_complete(NULL);
+       acpi_in_suspend = TRUE;
        return acpi_sleep_prepare(acpi_state);
 }
 
@@ -132,6 +140,7 @@ static int acpi_pm_finish(suspend_state_
        u32 acpi_state = acpi_suspend_states[pm_state];
 
        acpi_leave_sleep_state(acpi_state);
+       acpi_in_suspend = FALSE;
        acpi_disable_wakeup_device(acpi_state);
 
        /* reset firmware waking vector */
diff -r ac486e270597 -r 9b6b830abe8f drivers/acpi/thermal.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c    Sat Mar 18 08:35:34 2006 -0500
+++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c    Sun Mar 26 23:06:16 2006 -0500
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ static int tzp;
 static int tzp;
 module_param(tzp, int, 0);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(tzp, "Thermal zone polling frequency, in 1/10 seconds.\n");
+
+extern int acpi_in_suspend;
 
 static int acpi_thermal_add(struct acpi_device *device);
 static int acpi_thermal_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type);
@@ -683,6 +685,8 @@ static void acpi_thermal_run(unsigned lo
 static void acpi_thermal_run(unsigned long data)
 {
        struct acpi_thermal *tz = (struct acpi_thermal *)data;
+       if (acpi_in_suspend)    /* thermal methods might cause a hang */
+               return_VOID;    /* so don't do them */
        if (!tz->zombie)
                acpi_os_queue_for_execution(OSD_PRIORITY_GPE,
                                            acpi_thermal_check, (void *)data);
@@ -705,6 +709,8 @@ static void acpi_thermal_check(void *dat
 
        state = tz->state;
 
+       if (acpi_in_suspend)
+               return_VOID;
        result = acpi_thermal_get_temperature(tz);
        if (result)
                return_VOID;
@@ -1224,6 +1230,9 @@ static void acpi_thermal_notify(acpi_han
        struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
 
        ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_thermal_notify");
+
+       if (acpi_in_suspend)    /* thermal methods might cause a hang */
+               return_VOID;    /* so don't do them */
 
        if (!tz)
                return_VOID;



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to