http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6556





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-18 05:57 -------
First I am really happy to receive mail from you
It's first time i get message with English
I am afraid you understand my word correctly. cause I am not good
english.

yes...always fail with default boot option
and always success with "acpi=ht" and "acpi=off"

It tested so many time  from 2.6.15.?? to 2.6.16.14
Sometimes just hang with 2.6.15 kernel(it is default kernel with Dapper
  distribution)

here is attached files ...but i don't understand disable timestamp...
so i did just like this..
"sed 's/\[..............\]//' dmesg-s64000.ht.txt >
dmesg-s64000.ht.notstamp.txt"
"diff dmesg-s64000.ht.notstamp.txt dmesg-s64000.noht.nostamp.txt"

and i get message during pmtools-20051111's acpidump like this..
"Wrong checksum for generic table!"

Thanks for help


2006-05-18 (목), 00:08 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 쓰시길:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6556
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |acpi-
>                    |                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                    |                            |et
>             Summary|ACPI didn't wake up second  |CPU #1 not responding -
>                    |CPU( AMD 64 x2, ATI rd480   |cannot use it. - AMD 64 x2,
>                    |chipset)                    |ATI rd480 chipset
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-18 00:07 -------
> The CPU detection and startup sequence should be exactly the same
> with and without "acpi=ht", so I don't understand why that fails
> in the default and "acpi=ht" succeeds.
> If you try it multiple times, does it
> always succeed with "acpi=ht" and always fails without?
> 
> please disable the timestamps in your dmesg, and then attach (do not paste)
> the complete dmesg -s64000 output from the failure case, and all the
> success cases you can come up with.  Maybe when i diff these files
> I'll see something I missed in the pasted text below.
> 
> Also, please attach the output from acpidump, available in the latest
> pmtools here:
> http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
> 
> 
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> 
> 


------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to