http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8385
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-16 19:07 ------- What's the way forward here then? I note that the patch in comment #25 is noted to break a HP laptop (see header of commit 40d07080e585396dc58bc64befa1de0695318b3b). Now that an independent fix has been produced (comment #41), is that patch going to be re-applied to fix the HP laptop? I see that the patch in comment #41 isn't in the ACPI git tree yet, but it's only been a few days, I'm probably just being impatient :) >From the perspective of fixing Gentoo's 2.6.21 kernel, which patches should we backport, from the choices: comment #25, comment #26, comment #41 We'd like to match upstream as best as possible ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
