http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528
------- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-23 15:37 ------- Created an attachment (id=14161) --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14161&action=view) /proc/ioports from Abit KN9 Well, first things first; I'm withdrawing the patch because I didn't check I'd removed the custom DSDT which disabled the offending IO port write first... So, the patch doesn't work and can be safely ignored (feel free to jump off the CC list if this is now no longer relevant to you). However, we are still stuck with the problem that Linus' suspend commit in question is the cause here of a wedged suspend (as confirmed by Arthur, the original bug submitter). So, now that I've wasted everyone's time by CC'ing you all for a patch that doesn't work - what do we need to do to try and hunt down the real cause of why the 0x142E port write wedges suspend? Attached is the output of /proc/ioports As already noted here though, my first assumption was that PNPACPI was the culprit here - port 0x142E is in a range reserved by PNPACPI - but booting with pnpacpi=off has no effect on suspend (the range is no longer reserved, but suspend still wedges). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
