http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9488


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |acpi-
                   |                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                   |                            |et
          Component|Other                       |Power-Processor
            Summary|cpu locked at 800MHz due to |cpu locked at 800MHz due to
                   |_PPC                        |_PPC - FSC Lifebook E8410
                   |                            |Core2Duo 2.4GHz




------- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-01 10:43 -------
re: processor.ignore_ppc

Wups, looks like I dropped that one and it is indeed useful:-(
Thomas, is it okay if i call it processor.noppc to be consistent
with the existing processor.nocst?

re: P0: 2401 MHz, P1: 2400 MHz

This is the mechanism to enable Intel Dynamic Acceleration Technology
on processors that support it. eg. the processor is guaranteed to be
able to do 2400 MHz, but may be able to run faster if the system provides
thermal and electrical headroom.

As there is no guarantee that P0 will be any faster than P1,
a 1MHz delta is used to describe the opportunistic upside.

Please check if there are any BIOS SETUP options related to this,
or processor power management in general.  Also, please paste
the contents of /proc/cpuinfo


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to