http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9630
------- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 12:39 ------- I just applyed A patch, there's a little problem: values submitted are not the ones inside 2.6.23.12's include/pnp.h, do I have to patch another version? 2.6.23.11-12 diff patch [...] -#define PNP_MAX_PORT 24 -#define PNP_MAX_MEM 12 +#define PNP_MAX_PORT 8 +#define PNP_MAX_MEM 4 [...] suggested patch [...] -#define PNP_MAX_PORT 24 +#define PNP_MAX_PORT 40 #define PNP_MAX_MEM 12 [...] ? I decided to compile a 2.6.23.12 reverting this constants values as before 2.6.23.12: -#define PNP_MAX_PORT 8 -#define PNP_MAX_MEM 4 +#define PNP_MAX_PORT 24 +#define PNP_MAX_MEM 12 Tell me if I made a big mistake leaving PNP_MAX_PORT lower than suggested 40, or if I misunderstood something. My CPU is crunching the kernel now... I'll post the results soon. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
