http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10454
------- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-28 01:23 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Maybe we shouldn't bother looking at the signature at all, just stuff in > "SSDT" > and be done with it. I agree but I think we should distinguish between the table loading at ACPI start, here the spec says for the loading from RSDP: ... Notice that if OSPM finds a signature in a table that is not listed ... OSPM ignores the table even though the values in the Length and Checksum fields are correct ... but for the loading with "Load" ...The Definition Block should contain an ACPI DESCRIPTION_HEADER of type SSDT... in the linux implementation both is handled by the acpi_tb_add_table function. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
