http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10844
------- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-02 20:47 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Well, there's at least one bug in our restore code: we're not even bothering > to restore the interrupt configuration! It seems this patch is not enough to fix my problem. I still need to comment out disable_device. As I have mentioned in my bug report, if I reload i915 module after suspend, it works even without comment out disable_device. So there may be some bugs in the disable_device code path as well. And it seems that the video device will be disabled correctly even without call from drm, is this call necessary? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
