http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14679





--- Comment #27 from Lin Ming <[email protected]>  2009-11-26 02:03:23 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> It seems that there are indeed two DSDTs, if I'm interpreting this output 
> right
> (dsdt2.aml == dsdt_reported_by_kernel, 0xB13C was the length of the (first)
> DSDT reported in dmesg):
> 
> [m...@laptop ~]$ hexdump -Cv dsdt2.aml -s 0xB13C |head -2
> 0000b13c  44 53 44 54 3a 58 00 00  01 98 54 4f 53 49 4e 56  |DSDT:X....TOSINV|
> 0000b14c  54 4f 53 49 4e 56 30 30  01 00 00 00 49 4e 54 4c  |TOSINV00....INTL|
> 
> Not sure what this means though, as I haven't read enough of the ACPI spec to
> know whether this is even legal (is it a SSDT?)

Did you run "acpidump --addr 0xafee6000  --length 0xB13C >
DSDT_reported_by_kernel"?

If yes, please boot with acpi=off, then dump again

It's not the DSDT that dmesg shows
   ACPI: DSDT 00000000afee6000 0B13C (v01 TOSINV TOSINV00 F0000000 MSFT
01000013)

It's same as the DSDT in comment #2.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to