https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182
--- Comment #2 from Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> 2011-07-10 20:19:55 --- On Sunday, July 10, 2011, Olaf Freyer wrote: > This issue is still worth listing, as it isn't resolved yet. > > Jesse Barnes already tracked down the cause to commit > ccab5c82759e2ace74b2e84f82d1e0eedd932571 - > but what to do now remains unclear to me. > > With the patch reverted, I get down to 1 warning per workday - > without reverting it I'm at 70-90k warnings per workday. > > > Am 10.07.2011 12:58, schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.38 and 2.6.39. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36182 > > Subject : Erroneous package power limit notification since > > kernel 2.6.39 > > Submitter : Olaf Freyer <aaron...@gmx.net> > > Date : 2011-05-22 13:01 (50 days old) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
