https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42721





--- Comment #18 from jospez...@gmx.de  2012-02-10 10:39:14 ---
jlgentoo ~ # echo USB* > /proc/acpi/wakeup
jlgentoo ~ # cat /proc/acpi/wakeup
Device  S-state   Status   Sysfs node
PCI0      S5    *disabled  no-bus:pci0000:00
USB0      S4    *disabled  
USB1      S4    *disabled  
USB2      S4    *disabled  
USB3      S4    *enabled   pci:0000:00:10.0
USB4      S4    *enabled   pci:0000:00:10.1
USB5      S4    *enabled   pci:0000:00:10.2
USB6      S4    *enabled   pci:0000:00:10.3
AC97      S5    *disabled  pci:0000:00:11.5
PEXG      S5    *disabled  pci:0000:00:02.0
PEX0      S5    *disabled  pci:0000:00:03.0
PEX1      S5    *disabled  pci:0000:00:03.1
PEX2      S5    *disabled  pci:0000:00:03.2
PEX3      S5    *disabled  pci:0000:00:03.3
UAR1      S5    *disabled  pnp:00:08
jlgentoo ~ # pm-hibernate

It seems, the file is changed back automaticly. Tried to edit the file with
nano and set the enabled to disabled but it is the same old after that.
>From where does that file get his information or what part of the Kernel does
change that file?

jlgentoo ~ # ls -l /proc/acpi/wakeup
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 10. Feb 11:36 /proc/acpi/wakeup
jlgentoo ~ # ls -l /proc/acpi/wakeup
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 10. Feb 11:37 /proc/acpi/wakeup
jlgentoo ~ # ls -l /proc/acpi/wakeup
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 10. Feb 11:38 /proc/acpi/wakeup
jlgentoo ~ #

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to