https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155631

Lv Zheng <lv.zh...@intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|INVALID                     |WILL_NOT_FIX

--- Comment #11 from Lv Zheng <lv.zh...@intel.com> ---
If you extract the acpidump, you'll simply find redundant tables in it.
For example:

BDLI:
It can be found in ssdt9 and ssdt10:

  ...\155631\ssdt10.dsl (3 hits)
    Line 216:     Name (BDLI, 0x28)
    Line 2959:                 Store (DPLL, BDLI)
    Line 2960:                 Return (BDLI)
  ...\155631\ssdt9.dsl (3 hits)
    Line 216:     Name (BDLI, 0x28)
    Line 2959:                 Store (DPLL, BDLI)
    Line 2960:                 Return (BDLI)

Not sure if this indicates something wrong in ACPICA.
Let's simply mark it as rejected so that it can still be tracked in our
bugzilla triage process.
I'll close it after obtaining answers from other ACPI experts.

Thanks
Lv

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to