https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200367
--- Comment #2 from Paul Menzel ([email protected]) --- (In reply to Erik Schmauss from comment #1) > Hi Paul, > > How fast is the performance of the table load in earlier kernel versions? Let me check in the coreboot board status repository [1]. In `asrock/e350m1/4.7-51-g2ca4ca3f21/2018-01-18T22_05_03Z/kernel_log.txt` [2] Linux 4.14.13 is used. There is no “Dell OSI” yet, and it looks like it’s only 9 ms. ``` [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.14.0-3-686-pae ([email protected]) (gcc version 7.2.0 (De bian 7.2.0-19)) #1 SMP Debian 4.14.13-1 (2018-01-14) […] [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.14.0-3-686-pae root=/dev/mapper/speicher-root ro init=/lib/systemd/systemd-bootchart drm_kms_helper.poll=0 drm.debug=0x06 log_buf_len=2M quiet noisapnp pcie_aspm=force pcie_aspm.policy=powersave radeon.dpm=1 […] [ 0.060278] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device) [ 0.060281] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device) [ 0.060282] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions) [ 0.060285] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device) [ 0.060913] ACPI: Executed 3 blocks of module-level executable AML code [ 0.069295] ACPI: Interpreter enabled [ 0.069344] ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S4 S5) […] ``` Good idea to compare it with old versions. PS: We need a CI system that checks such things. [1]: https://review.coreboot.org/cgit/board-status.git/tree/asrock/e350m1 [2]: https://review.coreboot.org/cgit/board-status.git/tree/asrock/e350m1/4.7-51-g2ca4ca3f21/2018-01-18T22_05_03Z/kernel_log.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
