On Sep 19, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Aparajita Fishman wrote:

I'm curious -- who out there is actively using fusebox, and if so, what is your impression of it?

I am, (29 distinct sites and counting).

Things I like:
- the overall framework is really nice to work with, and the learning curve is rather flat. One can easily learn it in a day, master it in a week. - individual fuses are extremely modularized and can be moved and reused from site to site with real ease. The easy, built-in ability to call CSS files programmatically makes fuse logic reuse with differing presentation a snap. - the ability to "cascade" variables and logic from each fbx_settings file down through the rendering chain deserves mention. - the ability to call other fuses from within a fuse is extremely powerful, I so wish I could do this with 4D forms now - content can be highly separated from flow control, a major plus when content is supplied by non-technical staff

Things I dislike:
- given the framework and the fact that literally tens of files could be accessed in order to render a single page, debugging can sometimes be an adventure - even with TextMate and the A4D bundle, coding is still very tedious and I often miss the type ahead of Tables and Fields and Commands, etc. we're used to when working on the 4D side - the obscurity of the fusebox in general, and the fact that what example code does exist online is geared to ColdFusion and not readily usable with A4D.

The pluses far outweigh the negatives, in my opinion.

My wishlist:
- a 4D method to be executed on a given structure that produces a TextMate bundle that would allow for validation/type ahead of Tables and Fields. - when using custom error reporting, the ability to display the call chain of files

--
Bart Alcorn
National Service Center
800-500-6421 x 2360
AIM/iChat: balcornnsc


_______________________________________________
Active4D-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev
Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/

Reply via email to