http://mootools.net/slickspeed/
Overall, the combination of Safari+Prototype came out ahead
of everything else. (Only tried Safari, FireFox and IE7 on
Windows XP).
http://www.prototypejs.org/
That test was of the CSS3 selectors in the different Javascript
toolkits. That is not necessarily representative of the overall speed
of the toolkit.
In any case, for me what is more important is the design and power of
the functionality provided by the toolkit. jQuery (http://jquery.com)
is in many ways much more powerful than prototype and supports a
plugin architecture, so there is a huge library of plugins that add
great functionality to it.
If you want the Cadillac/Rolls Royce of javascript toolkits (IMHO),
check out Ext (http://extjs.com). It is totally amazing -- in some
ways more powerful that 4D's native interface tools.
Regards,
Aparajita
www.aparajitaworld.com
"If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed."
- Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoylibrary.com
_______________________________________________
Active4D-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev
Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
