Makes me wonder if fusebox is dead, or static and no longer evolving? Is it time to look at another, fresher framework for A4D work? Not that I have time to learn something new just for the sake of learning something new! It could just be a matter of 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it.'
MV -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aparajita Fishman Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:28 AM To: Active4D Developer Discussion List Subject: Re: [Active4d-dev] Training > IMHO Fusebox 4 and later targeted this problem by changing the way > layouts work and with the addition of content variables. I don't think > there would be much benefit in updating A4D to comply fully with > Fusebox 4 syntax or later especially the XML syntax would break all > existing apps. But just adding the new layout handling and content > variables to A4D would make it easier to generate complex, dynamic layouts > without cheating. I'd love to look into it, but the fusebox site is full of broken links, including their documentation link. Regards, Aparajita www.aparajitaworld.com "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoy.org _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://list.aparajitaworld.com/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://active4d-nabble.aparajitaworld.com/ ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5307 - Release Date: 10/03/12 _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://list.aparajitaworld.com/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://active4d-nabble.aparajitaworld.com/
