On Monday 04 June 2012, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 03.06.2012 18:47, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Saturday 02 June 2012 17:46:44 Marco Martin wrote: > >> yeah, that would be a good idea (and, good catch ;)), that dependency > >> doesn't really make sense there > > > > I was told by Stskeeps to file a bug on it, which I did > > ( https://bugs.nemomobile.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199 ). He told me they'd > > triage tomorrow, so this should be fixed soon. > > This is Sage's comment on the bug: > "PackageKit is configured to use connman, I'm not sure if there can be more > than one backends defined or if those can be separated to different > subpackages or something. Anyway there is at least config file that > defines the use of connman and then compile time backend that depends on > connman. Need to check if there is way to separe this so that it would not > drag in connman." > > Does somebody have an idea how to solve this?
yeah, seems that connman or networkmanager support is statically linked in the packagekit daemon and not a plugin, so doesn't seem possible to have both backends compled and installed at runtime :/ i hope it won't be needed a fork of the packagekit package :/ -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Active mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
