On Tuesday 15 January 2013 15:38:22 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Monday, January 14, 2013 14:11:25 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > Maybe this is the point where using Reviewboard may start making sense, > > so they can get their patches reviewed in a structured process? > > absolutely. question is whether we want/need a unique product for this, or > if we just use the plasma group for it. personally, i'd be happy with using > the plasma group as much of the changes should be looked at by the same > group of folks... hasn't there been the idea to merge active more into plasma again? If that is still the plan, it should just reuse the Plasma group.
-- Martin Gräßlin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Active mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
