Am Donnerstag, 15. August 2013, 16:27:14 schrieb Thomas Pfeiffer: > On 15.08.2013 12:52, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 23:36:07 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > >> I finished testing standard scenarios in PA4. > >> I've found two bugs which I would not advise to release with: > >> - The PMC problem (see previous mail). The fix is there, it just somehow > >> isn't in the package on this image > >> - The Rating filter seems completely broken ( > >> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323512 ). If that's not fixable, it > >> should be removed/hidden in PA4. It's not like this is a very important > >> filter, but when you tap a star and it does precisely zero, that gives a > >> very bad experience > >> > >> Other than that, I could not find any completely broken features or other > >> serious problems. If these two are fixed or worked around, PA 4 is good > >> to > >> go from my side! > > > > But you have to promise to not find showstoppers once these are fixed! > > I have already finished testing yesterday (and found no other > showstoppers than these two), so if the bugs are fixed without the fixes > causing more trouble somewhere else, I won't bother anyone anymore for > this release. > > > Seriously, we need to get it out. We'll always be able to find more things > > that need (really need!) fixing. But, as Aaron said: "If a project doesn't > > release, it dies". So we have to take our pride and reuse it for the next > > release. > > I confined myself to mentioning only those bugs that I think would have > a significant negative effect on the early experience. > > It might be comparing apples and oranges, but if I look at the game > industry, for example, companies that tend to delay a release to improve > its quality have a way better reputation with gamers than those that > release very buggy games and ship big bugfixes during the first few weeks. > > That does not mean we should imitate Duke Nukem Forever, of course ;) > > > Also, we can ship bugfixes to a released version. > > True, but see above. > > I am the quality coordinator, and I perceive it as one of my duties to > be the advocate for quality. In this role, my priorities are different > than yours, but I think that's a good thing: By negotiating between our > positions, we can arrive at a good balance between quality and > time-to-market. > > I'll retest the two problems with the newest image as soon as I get > home, I assume they're gone then, and I'll be all green lights for > releasing. > > > _______________________________________________ > Active mailing list > Active@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
Hi Thomas, thank you for testing so thoroughly and Marco for fixing the bugs so fast. Wolfhgang -- Wolfgang Romey Anhänge bitte nur in offenen Formaten wie z.B. die openoffice-Formate Diese email ist signiert.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active