Deji, Ulf, All,

Good article - thanks. Also thanks to Ulf - that was a much better solution and 
much better idea than mine. I do not profess to be a DNS legend, but am 
continuing to learn...

themolk.



________________________________

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Akomolafe, Deji
        Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2007 8:42 AM
        To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
        Subject: RE: RE : RE: [ActiveDir] Question about DNS SRV registration.


        I would not recommend that you do this. Please read the document I 
referenced in my previous response. Also, see Ulf's brief 
description/explanation of the behavior that you are seeing. I really recommend 
that you try to understand what is going on here.
        


        Sincerely,
           _____                               
          (, /  |  /)               /)     /)  
            /---| (/_  ______   ___// _   //  _
         ) /    |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
        (_/                             /)     
                                       (/      
        Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
        www.akomolafe.com <x-excid://32770000/uri:http://www.akomolafe.com>  - 
we know IT
        -5.75, -3.23
        Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about 
Yesterday? -anon

________________________________

        From: Yann
        Sent: Tue 1/23/2007 2:16 PM
        To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
        Subject: RE : RE: [ActiveDir] Question about DNS SRV registration.


        Steve,
        
        Thanks for fast reply;
        My example is the reflect of what i had in real production.
        
        So in my production, i have about 15 sites AD and we are in the process 
of migration (adding more sites).
        
        So you mean that i have to create 15 child dns domain and set each DCs 
in each site authoriatative for their respective child domain ?
        
        It seems to be a lot of work ... but i will follow into your direction.
        
        Thanks again,
        
        Yann


        "Molkentin, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :

                Yann,
                
                Create a child DNS domain for the site containing DCb, and 
establish DCb as the authoritative server for that domain. If you have 
resources in Sitea you'll then need to ensure there is a forwarder set up for 
resolution, etc. Remember that separate DNS domains can exist within the one 
logical windows domain.
                
                At least I think this would solve your problem...
                
                themolk.
                


________________________________

                        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of Yann
                        Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2007 7:28 AM
                        To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
                        Subject: [ActiveDir] Question about DNS SRV 
registration.
                
                
                        Hello all and happy new year:-),
                        
                        Say:
                        -> Site A with DCa that is also dns (integrated to AD).
                        -> Site B that is a new site.
                        my goal: dcpromo a new DC (DCb) in site B.DCb will be 
also dns (integrated to AD).
                        -> DCa & DCb belong to the same domain (domain.local).
                        My AD is w2k3 FFL mode.
                        
                        In order to add the new DCb in the existing domain.com, 
DCb is  dns client to DCa.
                        
                        When dcpromo is finished, i configured:
                        - DCb as dns client for himself
                        - DCa as secondary dns sever for DCb.
                        
                        Everything looks good .. BUT:
                        When clients in site B ask for all DCs in site B (with 
netlogon process),DCb returns DCb and DCa !
                        a  nslookup set type=srv 
_ldap._tcp.siteB._sites.domain.local shows the 2 DCs
                        -> DCa.domain.local
                        -> DCb.domain.local
                        
                        When i search in dns console, i found that DCa still 
present in site B, i think, this is due to the fact that DCb's nic allow 
dynamic update and thus dynamically records DCa srv records.
                        The only way i found to avoid DCb returning DCa to 
clients in site B is to delete srv records for DCa in dns (site B).
                        
                        Question:
                        What is the best practice to avoid DCb to return DCa to 
clients and where in the process i'm wrong ?
                        
                        Thanks,
                        
                        Yann
                        
                        
________________________________

                        Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à 
toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des 
expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
<http://fr.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42054/*http://fr.answers.yahoo.com> .

This email (including any attachments) contains confidential information and is 
intended only for the named addressee. If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender 
immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this 
email from your system and destroy any copies.

This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, 
adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner.

Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free and emails 
may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects and may 
not be successfully replicated on other systems. The sender does not give any 
warranties nor accepts any liability in relation to any of these matters. If 
you have any doubt about the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us, 
please contact us immediately.




________________________________

        Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos 
questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des 
internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
<http://fr.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42054/*http://fr.answers.yahoo.com> .



This email (including any attachments)  contains confidential  information and 
is intended only for the named addressee. If you are not the named addressee 
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the 
sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and 
delete this email from your system and destroy any copies.

This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, 
adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner.

Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free and  emails 
may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects and may 
not be successfully replicated on other systems. The sender does not give any 
warranties nor accepts any liability in relation to any of these matters. If 
you have any doubt about the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us, 
please contact us immediately. 

Reply via email to