I can't ever seem to send mail to the list....what's going on? -Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allen, Richard Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 9:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Clusters - Good or Bad idea?
Please remove me. thanks -----Original Message----- From: Mike Tonazzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 March 2002 17:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: [ActiveDir] Clusters - Good or Bad idea? Is it a big price difference btwn. BigIP and Win2K NLBS? -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Ayers, Diane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. M�rz 2002 18:09 An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Betreff: RE: [ActiveDir] Clusters - Good or Bad idea? We've used both the NT 4.0 WLBS and WIn2K NLBS and we gave both up for a hardware based solution. We went with BigIP. It gave us a better solution with more options. Diane -----Original Message----- From: Jason Benway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:50 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Clusters - Good or Bad idea? We are doing this in our current environment. We are using Win2K load balance. We have some clusters and some load balance clusters. Both work great! Let me know if you would like more details jb -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:08 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [ActiveDir] Clusters - Good or Bad idea? Hi All, I am currently specing out a number of new file and printers servers for our HQ with about 700 users (at the moment). I'm considering using W2K Advanced server to cluster machines. My first questions is, is this a good idea? Can you load balance across servers? Where I am coming from is I want the users at the site, to be able to connect to the machine(s) with one name using the same disk array. There could be 4 or more servers in the cluster, if one of the servers fails, the users get moved over to one of the working machines. Also, can it load balances itself across the machines. For expandability, if we find we need more storage or disk capacity, we can just add another server to the cluster or more disk to the external device? Is this possible in a File and Print only environment, or am I living in a dream world? Thanks for you comments Jamie Simcox PC Network Technician J C Bamford Excavators Ltd _______________________________________________________________ J. C. Bamford Excavators Ltd. Registered Office: Rocester, Staffordshire, England. ST14 5JP Registered No. 561597 England _______________________________________________________________ The contents of this Email communication are confidential to the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient you may not disclose or distribute this communication in any form but should immediately contact the Sender. The information, images, documents and views expressed in this Email are personal to the Sender and do not expressly or implicitly represent official positions and policies of the J C B group of companies ("JCB") and no authority exists on behalf of JCB to make any agreements, representations or other binding commitment by means of Email. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
