With AD integration, this ain't your father's DNS. This is shared function here as we are at the server level split between Unix and Windows in separate zones. We have done similar to what you propose. Communication MUST be there. Each must know what the other is doing.
I am not sure what you mean by 'Y2K DNS'. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP Senior Systems Analyst - Messaging and Collaboration Illuminet - A Verisign Company -----Original Message----- From: DeGrands, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:42 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS control Hello all, I need some advice on DNS, please. Who controls DNS in your organization? We currently use Y2K DNS for our internal and external zones. The security team has brought up the possibility of taking over the DNS structure. We, on the AD team, feel it would be a bad deal for internal resolution but we'll give up external zones. We are concerned that the new security officer came from old school DNS and doesn't understand the tight integration that Y2K involves. This is just sort and sweet to see if I can generate any comments for you. Thanks in advance. Charles List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
