Do it however it works for you. I had enough troubles with Novell NDS-integrated DNS and so much joy with BIND 8.x and 9.x textfile-based DNS, I stood fast in my refusal to allow AD integration of my DNS. There is none whatsoever in my enterprise, and there will be until I am either a.) gone or b. not superstitious.
-----Original Message----- From: Marvin Cummings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 10:47 AM To: ActiveDir; NT 2000 Discussions Subject: [ActiveDir] NTDS KCC floods... Can I get some feedback on the following scenerio? 1 root domain controller running w2k, dns, dhcp 2 newly created child domain servers For the sake of consistency is it necessary to have AD-Integrated zones installed on all DC's or should I place Standar Primary zones on the child domains and leave the AD-Integrated zone on the root DNS server? I'm lookin at an article from Microsoft that outlines the procedures but they use Standard Primary zones as opposed to AD-Integrated zones on the child domains. Just looking to see how others have approached this. TIA List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
