|
Read the following: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/ad/windows2000/plan/addeladm.asp. It pretty much describes the advantages
and disadvantages of all these strategies. -----Original Message----- I am currently work for a startup,
(not a dot-bomb), that is in the process of becoming independent from our
parent company. At this time, all IT-related resources are provided by our
parent company. I would prefer to build a brand-new Active Directory infrastructure
from the start. However, because of the current economic climate, I've
had to develop some alternative plans. Ultimately, the goal is to become
fully independent with a completely separate IT infrastructure. I can envision
three possible scenarios: 1) Create a new child domain within
the existing infrastructure, create a new Exchange server and complete the
migration all user accounts and data, transition the remaining IT-resources to
the new child domain, (SQL 2000 & Sharepoint) and then eventually migrate
the child domain to a new Active Directory Tree / Forest? 2) Create a new Tree and Domain
within the existing Forest, migrate all IT-resources and then transition everything
to a new Forest. 3) Create a new Active Directory
Forest, establish a two-way trust between both Forests, and then begin the
migration of IT-resources starting with the Exchange and other user-specific
data. Does anyone have any recommendations,
suggestions or advice on the best path to take with the ultimate goal in mind? Thanks Jim |
- [ActiveDir] Domain Migration Patton, Jim
- RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Migration Craig Cerino
- RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Migration Gil Kirkpatrick
- RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Migration Roger Seielstad
