No parity calculations. HUGE difference.

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Shawn.Hayes@;compass.net] 
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAID Configuration on DC's Part 3
> 
> 
> Please explain how you will gain any performance increases 
> when all three of your arrays exist on the same SCSI channel. 
> Seems to me you have a single pipe leading to and from 
> multiple arrays.  It is not hard to figure where the bottle 
> neck will be.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devan Pala [mailto:dpala@;hotmail.com] 
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] RAID Configuration on DC's Part 3
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for all your replies earlier.
> 
> Yes, it is true that the server only has 6 drive bays. The 
> array controller 
> has 2 internal and 2 external ports but I can only use one 
> internally since 
> the 6 drive bays only terminate to one SCSI port. (in this particular 
> server). Reason for buying the high-end controller is due to 
> standards and a 
> proven track record in production.
> 
> Reason for not upgrading the chassis is primarily cost 
> especially in the 
> branch offices, the root and hub-site controllers are and 
> will be configured 
> entirely different, dual array controllers, quad-xeon 
> processors etc. The 
> whole nine yards.
> 
> The database has been sized and definitely over-engineered 
> for the approx. 
> 2500 users spread over 15 sites in the Americas and Europe.
> 
> I do understand that read performance for the database will 
> be greater under 
> a Raid 5 (stripe set with parity) config. but that means 
> combining the Logs 
> as well. Therefore, in order to gain both performance and 
> recovery benefits 
> from segregating the OS, Logs and Database to their own 
> spindle sets makes 
> sense over a simple Raid 1 and Raid 5 config. (just as my 
> mate Linton put 
> it). So I'm going with three Raid 1 arrays.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Broadband?�Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. 
> http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : 
> http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to