|
I've
read opinions from several Microsoft reps in the Microsoft partners newsgroups,
and just about every one has said that it's a good idea to have AV on everything
possible.
The
problem as I see it is that AV software is only as good as its definitionf
iles. The definition files are only as good as the people reporting the
viruses. That means that for a definition file to know about a virus, the
virus must already be in the wild. So imagine the "next" virus that comes
out before the definition files do and it infects your desktops, which
in turn infect your servers. Now, as soon as the definition files are
updated on the desktops they are "fixed", but the servers are still infected,
with no way of repairing themselves.
Personally I've never had a problem with AV software on a serverc
onflicting with anything. That includes terminal servers and CitrixM
etaframe. Others I know have had problems, but for me, there's no way I
would put a server out there without any AV protection...
Also,
take a look at this link:
That's
technet's quick tips on how to secure a Win2k server...
Adam
|
Title: Message
- [ActiveDir] MS weigh's in on AD and Network Core Se... Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
- Re: [ActiveDir] MS weigh's in on AD and Networ... Graham Turner
- RE: [ActiveDir] MS weigh's in on AD and Networ... Granatella Adam J
- RE: [ActiveDir] MS weigh's in on AD and Networ... Purviance, Chad
- RE: [ActiveDir] MS weigh's in on AD and Networ... Granatella Adam J
