Good luck if you ever email anyone running Watch Your Back from Grinning Shark software.
Ever see a read receipt request generate a mail storm? Its fun. ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? > > > Man oh man...I really don't think this is 1) appropriate for the list > and 2) appropriate for the list! =) Read receipts are a > problem, a lot > of people (including myself) request them for every email we send. I > need it to track who has ready what message, etc. They are > VERY handy. > I know that I myself have forgotten to turn them off before > posing once > and have gotten HUNDREDS of replies. I think that we can > just live with > the one or two a week we get through the list and live our > lives just as > happily as ever!!! > > The signal to noise ratio is normally VERY high in this > forum, and that, > as Martha would say, is a good thing! So, try not to ruin it for > everyone, Ok? Ok! > > Anyways, just my 1/50 of a dollar. > > Benton Chase Wink > ----------------------------------------------- > Benton Chase Wink, CCNA MCSE > McCombs School of Business > Enterprise Server Team > ofc: 512-471-9938 > cell: 512-619-9016 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? > > > KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE GOD ^^^^ ^^^^^^^ READ RECEIPTS..........HOW MANY > TIMES DO PEOPLE HAVE TO TELL YOU THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > King, Arron S. > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? > > > You could try to do Radius or perhaps LDAP authentication if > your dialin > server software would support it. > > We do Radius with a wholesale ISP and it works quite nicely. > > > ======================================= > Arron S. King > Network & Systems Administrator > Ohio Dominican University > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > v: 614.251.4515 > f: 614.252.2650 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ActiveDir] RAS Auth, Linux and AD? > > > Is it possible, or anyone know of any tips on how to get a linux box > with an 8 port modem card (dialin server) to auth via an AD DC to get > permissions, etc? I wanted to try to mess around with this.. > > Thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:26 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > > > We have been testing the .NET Server in our environment. > > There are many enhancements that have made our life easier. > > Our company is a large Bank in South Africa and we operate in many > African countries and with this we have the issue of bad > telecommunications to our foreign branches. > > We are using the feature called "Replicate from Media". > All you need to do now is perform a System State Backup and > then restore > to the new server. Run DCPromo with an ADV switch and point to the > Restore location. Hey presto you will have your entire directory > replicated to the local DC and with the replication schedule set up it > will receive the updates which will be minimal. > > Other features include: > DNS Stub Zones > Conditional Forwarding > Application Partition: Replication to set to replicate to all > domains or > certain domains. (Very cool feature) GC-Less Logon: Logon requests can > be accepted without the need of a GC in the site. (Must have logged on > previously but will continue with a cache > profile) > DC Rename: Very cool but you need .NET Native mode. > Domain Rename: also need .NET Native > (Be very sure that you want to perform this as you need to reboot your > servers twice with other configuration changes) Forest Trust: > Transitive > trusts will be the name of the game for this which is pretty cool > considering previously you had to set up external trust from the one > domain to the required one. > > One last thing IIS 6.0 is much better stable, secure than the previous > versions. > > Hope this info helps you. > These are from the top of my head. > > Need anything else let me know. > > Yusuf > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 27 January, 2003 21:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > > yes > > -----Original Message----- > From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:58 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > > > Is windows 2003 Windows .NET?????? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:05 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > > I've been running it in a lab environment for several months. > The AD in > WS2K3 is fundamentally as it was in W2K, with some notable > improvements > in the KCC (reduced computation needed for topology calculation), > replication (value replication instead of attribute replication for > certain attributes), and multi-forest support (cross forest trust). A > nice security improvement is that anonymous users by default have no > access and therefore can't mount DOS attacks on AD. Supposedly the > overall performance of AD has been improved, but I haven't assessed > that. There are improvements in some of the AD-related admin tools as > well. > > Summary: notable but not revolutionary improvements. The > upgrade path is > fairly low friction, so I'd feel pretty comfortable starting > deployment > of WS2K3 when it ships. > > -gil > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory - Windows Server 2003 > > > Hello Everyone! > > With the new version of Windows Server 2003 there's a new version of > Active Directory. It seems to have some more features than the > Windows2000 Active Directory. Windows Server 2003 is due to > be released > in April. Has anyone tested, implemented, or researched this > version and > found it much better than Windows2000 version? > > > Thanks in advance your advice and input! > > Cliff Airhart > Answer Financial Inc. > Senior Systems Administrator - Server Support / eBusiness > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 818.644.4225 We answer to you. > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > ______________________________________________ > > Disclaimer and confidentiality note > > > Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official > business of > Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is > confidential, legally > privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own > and endorse > any other content. > Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as > being that of Standard Bank. > > The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. > Please notify the sender > immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, > disclose or use the content in any way. > > Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication > has been maintained nor > that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. > > ______________________________________________ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
