Correct. Much of the underlying protocol was completely rewritten with Kerberos v5. It's a whole new beast with zero backwards compatibility, which is why I'm not worried about it.
-------------------------------------------------------------- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Vulnerability > > > Given the high visibility of ANYTHING Microsoft, they have to > review these issues - even though there is likely no > connection - other than name.... > > Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT > Microsoft MVP - Active Directory > Associate Expert > Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd > (NIH/CIT) > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:56 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Understood, > > I just saw this quote "Microsoft officials said that, while > they're still researching the issue, they don't believe that > operating system is vulnerable." and know that some MSFT > people read this list, and maybe they would be willing to > enlighten the list when they have something more concrete. > > Thanks, > > Todd > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:17 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Vulnerability > > > AD won't be affected. The vulnerability was found in Kerberos > v4, while AD is built on Kerberos v5. Very different beast. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:12 PM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: [ActiveDir] Kerberos Vulnerability > > > > > > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,937385,00.asp > > > > Just saw this and wondered if anyone on the list has a > comment about > > it. I sent a request to our MS TAM for comment on the article and > > will post anything I get to the list. > > > > Todd Myrick > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > > List archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > > > List info : > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
