I'd agree with you on the consultant.

I'm guessing that what you're seeing is the result of an inconsistant
replication topology. I'd even be willing to bet that what's happening is
the KCC is constantly modifying the topology, and its never fully acquiesed.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond McClinnis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Replication Problems...
> 
> 
> Bob,
> 
> There have been some other weird issues, for instance it took 
> TWO days for a computer to finally be deleted in active 
> directory, DNS disappearing off of a couple domain 
> controllers after that and some name resolution problems 
> which may or may not be related.  
> 
> 
> I'm really beginning to think the consultant that came out 
> here didn't plan us out very well... -=groan=-
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Raymond McClinnis 
> Network Administrator
> Provident Credit Union
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobel, Robert
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Replication Problems...
> 
> Is the returning group membership issue the only problem your seeing?
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Bob
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond McClinnis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Replication Problems...
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Does anyone know a good topology for a bridged WAN.  Once 
> everyone picks
> up their jaws, I'll continue.   We have approximately 18 DC's 
> at remote
> sites on various low bandwidth lines (from 384K to T-1).  By 
> default all the servers are trying to talk to each other and 
> there have been instances of us removing users from groups 
> and the user returning to the group.  
> 
> I had thought of pointing all the remote controllers to the 
> DC's here at HQ.  and having the ones here at HQ talk amongst 
> themselves.  Is this a good idea, or is there a better 
> solution.  I appreciate any input y'all can give me.
> 
> 
> Thanks in Advance, 
> 
> Raymond McClinnis
> Network Administrator
> Provident Credit Union
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : 
> http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> List info   : 
> http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to