I know only one Exchange Organization per forest, but someone mentioned to me that if you have a forest structure with trees instead of child domains you have to have an Exchange Organization for each one because of the namespace issue. I don't believe that sounds correct, but I am not an Exchange expert.(Exchange 2003)
-----Original Message----- From: Sullivan, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/Exchange Question You can have only one Ex2000 organization per forest. Or are you talking about Exchange 5.5? Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Ellis, Debbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] AD/Exchange Question My company is getting ready to migrate to Windows 2003 Active Directory from NT 4.0. Our design is to have separate trees in the enterprise forest. Do we have to have separate Exchange Organizations or is there a work around to still have one? List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
