No. THOSE guys I leave alone.

I have not had any reason to-date to apply unique policies to any default
account.

D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
www.akomolafe.com
www.iyaburo.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday?  -anon


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Kinnamon
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OU and GPO Design Comments

Do you still store groups that are created by default (such as Exchange
groups or built-in groups) in the Users container?

... 'Cause I had big problems when I tried to move an Exchange Admins group
during initial deployment.


Dave




-----Original Message-----
From: deji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OU and GPO Design Comments


Looks intelligent to me :)

Mine is more like:

|--Branches
        |--Enterprise
           |--Users
         |--Computers
           |--Groups
        |--HR
           |--Users
         |--Computers
           |--Groups
        |--Engineering
           |--Users
         |--Computers
           |--Groups
        |--Executives
           |--Users
         |--Computers
           |--Groups

Enterprise contains EVERYTHING that is common to all the Departments. Each
Department contains what is common to it. The driving force behind the
design decision is the need to "EXCLUDE" Engineering and "special interests"
from ANYTHING that MAY impact their operations. Management's call, not mine.

The moral of my story - I have yet to see an absolute standard for OU
design. Your design will be driven mostly by your corporate goals (and
politics). As long as you understand the OU concept and what it's intended
for, I'd say you are in the clear.

D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
www.akomolafe.com
www.iyaburo.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday?  -anon


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] OU and GPO Design Comments

I'm interested in feedback on the following OU and GPO design.

Simple OU structure, something like:

|--Branches
        |--Users
        |--Computers

The "Users" OU would hold around 5000 users and the "Computers" OU an equal
amount of workstations and servers.

GPO's would be created for the users and linked to the OU, but only applied
to certain global groups that the users would be members of.  Similar for
the computers.  There would be an "All Users" and "All Computers" GPO with
global settings, then more granular GPO's for departmental specific
settings.

Almost all administration would be done centrally, so there should be
little need for delegation.

This seems like it should be simple and effective, but we haven't tried it
real-world, so I'm curious if people have any thoughts on possible
gotcha's, issues, etc.



--
David

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to