A better (read: more extensible) scheme would be create a single application
object for each application you wish to secure, and use the ACLs on the
objects to control access to the application. For instance, if the
application is domain specific, you might put the application object in the
CN=Program Data,DC=domain container. If it is an enterprise app, you might
create a container somewhere under CN=Services,CN=Configuration,... To check
if someone has access to run the app, just have the app read the obejct. If
the app can read the object, the user can run the app, otherwise not.

-gil

-----Original Message-----
From: Sharma, Shshank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Extending the Active Directory Schema


I am thinking about something similar, such as adding attributes like
allowAccessToApplicationX, allowAccessToApplicationY and so on, for users.

How easy is doing something like this, anyone ?

./Shshank

-----Original Message-----
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Extending the Active Directory Schema


Has anyone extended the active directory to include the employee number as a
displayed field?  I understand that this field exists, but not no attributes
has been set.  I want to add the employee number in the displayed items when
setting up the user account.  

Running W2K Sp3...

Ron Pennell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to