RE: [ActiveDir] Question About Schema Extensions.... Chicken or Egg

[Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)]

Title: Message

Thanks Benton...

 

Todd

-----Original Message-----
From: Benton Wink {winkb} [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question About Schema Extensions.... Chicken or Egg

You do NOT have to have the Server 2003 AD schema extensions for Exchange 2003.  You lose some minor functionality, nothing major.  We are currently in production with Exchange 2003 w/o Server 2003 AD.

 

Benton Chase Wink

---

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Question About Schema Extensions.... Chicken or Egg

We just learned that Exchange 2003 will be RTM next week.  And the Exchange lead is chomping at the bit to extend the schema for it.  We have two problems, we have not extended the schema for Windows 2003, and we have a site design that has some replication issues due to firewalls.  We are in the process of fixing and optimizing the site design.  The question I have is Windows 2003 schema extensions required before Exchange 2003 ones.  The reason why I ask is because I though I remembered that Andres Luther at the DEC 2003 saying that there were two bug fixes for Exchange 2000 schema extensions in the Windows 2003 schema extensions.

 

Thanks,

 

Todd Myrick