Graham, System Policy on NT 4.0 is truly tatooed to the system. If you turn it off and back on, it's still there - unless manually removed or the policy is backed out via the de-application of said policy.
And, sadly - I can't tell you right now what needs to run (yes the Agent, damn it - but what IS the Agent?).... Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT Microsoft MVP - Active Directory Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graham Turner Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] admt 2.0 - nt4 computer migration but then thinking about it no - when i failed on the first nt4 host thought it was down to that computer so tried another one straight away - same access denied result have spoken with the developers of the nt4 build - there is a system policy with an allowedrunlist policy - that was that even while logged off this registry value is tattooed into the computer registry ???? if this is possible which i must confess to not being sure on then need to work out what actually needs to be allowed to run for the admt dispatch agent to execute clutching at straws a bit !!! GT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilkinson, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:01 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] admt 2.0 - nt4 computer migration > I think Larry's first response could be it Graham. > > We saw exactly this in our testing with the Quest Migrator product. > You must make sure there is no computer account with the same name > already in the AD - hiding in an OU you least expect it! (ours got > there during testing by manually moving test boxes in and out of the > ad domain and forgetting to remove the computer accounts. > > > Stephen Wilkinson > > Tel +44(0)207 4759276 > Mobile +44(0)7973 143970 > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duncan, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 July 2003 21:45 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Has the "Everyone" group been added to the "Pre-Windows 2000 > Compatible Access" group in the new domain? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ActiveDir] admt 2.0 - nt4 computer migration > > Am attempting the migration of computer from NT4 source domain to > Windows 2000 target domain. > > the migration environment is working fine with windows 2000 > professional clients > > have got issues with the migration of an NT4 workstation > > the extract from dispatch.log on the admt server is attached from > which i am > hoping to get a few clues as to the "access denied" > > have checked the "obvious" issues such as sourcedom\domain admins > being a member of the local administrators group and the computer > migration being run while logged an as a member of that > sourcedom\domain admins group > > Thanks > > GT > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail > disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to > http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
