If you use SP4 your DCs will request a new rid pool as soon as 50% of the old pool is consumed. Have a look here: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b316201 You can also adjust the number of rids a DC requests by changing the "RID Block Size" value in the registry (see same document).
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Graham Turner Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 19:12 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [ActiveDir] RID master / ADMT 2.0 just wanted to get any issues that have come to light during an ADMT process specfically relating to the function of the RID master when doing a mid size migration (approx 4000 objects) it seems the allocation of RIDs' may become an issue. the operation of rid master is understood to be allocation of a new pool after a percentage of the current pool is exhausted - in an ADMT 2.0 migration of approx (4000 users) this would be quickly exhausted perhaps leaving potential for failure of the ADMT 2.0 if it can get another RID in good time from a newly allocated pool. this does beg another question - is there any known issue of delay in the allocation of new rid pool ?? GT List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
