I
meant to include this also -
Server
migration newsgroup on Usenet - news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
(This
is a new newsgroup that was set up recently. The MS Community website ( http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/community/default.mspx
) was hosting it for a while, but for some reason no
longer.)
It can
still be viewed on the web though, via Google - http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=microsoft.public.windows.server.migration
regards
dar
-----Original Message-----
From: Hughes. Daryn (IT Solutions)
Sent: 24 July 2003 10:37
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Migration : NT to Win 2k3 Active Directory
From: Hughes. Daryn (IT Solutions)
Sent: 24 July 2003 10:37
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Migration : NT to Win 2k3 Active Directory
Upgrading from Windows NT Server 4.0 - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/upgrading/nt4/default.mspxI'd also still recommend the Domain Migration Cookbook, even though its focus is on W2K. There is an updated version of this that includes the new features of ADMT2, but the document is unfinished and might not be on general release yet - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url="">regardsdaryn
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Sharma, Shshank
Sent: Wed 7/23/2003 4:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Migration : NT to Win 2k3 Active DirectoryHi,What would be a good reference for migrating from an NT domain to Win2k3 Active Directory ?I'm looking for a HOW-TO document.Also, any peculiar experiences, things-to-watch-out for would be very useful too.
* ** *** ** * ** *** ** * ** *** ** *
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily
represent those of ESB.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender.
Although ESB scans e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee
that either are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained
as a result of viruses.
* ** *** ** * ** *** ** * ** *** ** *
