Rick, please excuse the whinge

borne out of a bit of frustration i am afraid !!

am needing to write procedural documents for what i would regard as a fairly
simple task (and given issues we have with allowed run list policy values
not unlikely either !!)

ie restore of a inadvertantly (or otherwise !) deleted or corrupt GPO

not unreasonable to have had functionality equiv to GPMC in win2k ??

duly noted on GPMC - will recommend to deploy as soon as possible

without GPMC, it seems there are all sorts of interdependencies on AD
objects / SYSVOL file system objects which need to be got right when
restoring GPO

was looking to seek the views of others on the procedure for this restore
say of a single GPO ??

as per my original mail;

1. DS restore mode

2. restore of what sysvol file system directories / system state to original

3. restore (what ?) to alternate location

3. ntdsutil - run authoritative restore (seems only to apply to AD objects)

4. copy certain file system directories (polices / scripts ??) to original
location

Thanks for your help throughout

GT

GT


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Kingslan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 2:34 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore


> Graham,
>
> Though I don't totally disagree, I'm not sure what part of the picture is
> missing to cause you to make a statement such as:
>
> "Microsoft seem incapable of delivering finished products !"
>
> The GPMC *does* make it much easier - and I have been a big champion on
this
> product, and is by far the preferred method.  But, before GPMC (6 years
> before, in fact) we have survived quite well with Auth Restore, Systems
> State resore, and Data backup restores.
>
> What part of the picture am I missing that would indicate Microsoft missed
> the boat on restoring GPOs in your case?
>
> Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT
> Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
> Associate Expert
> Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graham Turner
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore
>
> Darren, thanks for the very informative post reply.
>
> you seem only to confirm my views of what should be a relatively simple
task
> is not so - although happy to see this complexity reduced with GPMC does
not
> nothing to dispel my opinion that Microsoft seem incapable of delivering
> finished products !
>
> Thanks again
>
> GT
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darren Mar-Elia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 9:30 PM
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore
>
>
> Graham-
> You're absolutely rigth about the dependencies between the AD and SYSVOL
> portions of a GPO. As you probably have noticed, the AD portion is stored
in
> the Domain NC under SYSTEM\POLICIES\<GUID OF GPO> and the SYSVOL part is
in
> SYSVOL\POLICIES\<GUID OF GPO>. The AD portion, formerly called the Group
> Policy Container (GPC) (until MS released the GPMC and decided they didn't
> like any of the old names for stuff (!)), contains attributes that
reference
> the SYSVOL path, the version of the GPO and some other stuff. If for
> example, you have used software installation policy to deploy applications
> via GPO, then the GPC contains a set of AD object known as the Class
Store,
> which contains packageRegistration objects for each app deployed. These
> objects reference application advertisement scripts (.aas) file stored in
> the SYSVOL portion of the GPO (aka the Group Policy Container or GPT).
>
> In terms of disaster recovery of an individual GPO, you're correct that
> authoritative restore isn't very flexible. Your steps below seem
reasonable
> although I haven't used that mechanism to restore a single GPO before.
> Frankly, I think you're better off using Microsoft's free GPMC tool to do
> backup/restore of individual GPOs. Its easy to use, scriptable and
restores
> individual GPOs with their original GUID intact.
> This is a lot more flexible than authoritative restore or any other
> mechanism that has to try and extract portions of a single GPO from
backups
> of system state.
>
> Darren
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 11:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore
>
>
> was hoping to get a bit more detail on the procedure of restore of a GPO
and
> specifically the inter-dependencies of the sysvol folder data and AD data
>
> it would seem say in the scenario of an inadevertantly modified / deleted
> GPO (and which has been replicated throughout the domain) that it is not
> simply a matter of restore of the sysvol data, and that indeed it is
> required to go through a sequence along the lines of;
>
> boot into DS restore mode;
> restore system state to its original location restore system state to
> alternative location
>
> authoritatively restore the entire database (didn't understand this - i
> would have thought at most the object with the GUID of the GPO using
restore
> subtree ?)
>
> restart the DC in normal mode and wait for the sysvol to mount
>
> then a copy of what looks to be like the folder of sysvol / policies with
> the GUID of the GPO from the alternative location
>
> have derived the above from the various papers on disaster recovery et al.
>
> hoping people can put any of the above right, especially with notes on the
> various interdependencies of the directory objects / file system contents
> relating to GPO
>
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to