Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement
Joel,
 
Excellent point, and thanks for the information as I, too, just ran into an issue with Outlook 2002 that needed to have the GC pointed to another location.  However, it's much easier in Outlook 2003 - just another bonus.
 

Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Merry, Joel (US - Philadelphia)
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement

More than just changing it to a GC, you'll need to change the server to which the Outlook client points. OL2002 can be configured to dynamically use the local GC, but OL2000 isn't quite as flexible.

This article explains how to configure OL2000 to use the local GC: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;272290

This article explains how to configure OL2002 to dynamically use the closest GC: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;319206

Good luck!

-Joel




-----Original Message-----
From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement

I would also suggest making sure that you schedule replication at specific

intervals to that location by making it a site, and not use the bandwidth

for constant directory replication.

Toddler

-----Original Message-----

From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:10 PM

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement


Jennifer,

Make the DC at the remote a GC - it is going to greatly speed up the

resolution of many functions that are not exactly unique to Exchange, but do

play a part in it's operation.

Even if the Exchange server is remote to the user, they will use a GC local

to them.

Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT

Microsoft MVP - Active Directory

Associate Expert

Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone

 

-----Original Message-----

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Fountain

Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:33 PM

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: [ActiveDir] Global Catalog placement

I need some advice on placing a GC at one of my remote locations.  I have a

256kbps connection to my remote site that only contains 20 people.  I have a

DC installed at that location but users connect to their email at my

location.  Currently when they click to send an email, it takes 19-20

seconds to send. - outlook 2000 sp3 (receiving seems to be ok)  I am

wondering - if making their existing DC into a GC, it may speed up? grasping

here? I hate to put an exchange server at that location with only 20 people

but according to this article:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url="">

echnol/windowsserver2003/proddocs/deployguide/dssbd_topo_dljo.asp it is not

advised to put a GC at that location - granted this seems to be for windows

2003 and we have 2000 - not sure if ths still pertains. 

any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Jenn

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm

List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm

List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm

List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm

List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm

List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm

List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


Reply via email to