|
That
is simply a new tree in your forest, pretty basic. It doesn't have to be
disjoint (neither netbios to AD name nor AD domain name to machine
domain suffix).
If you
want true admin level security boundaries though, you are talking separate
forests.
My
running recommendation for AD is you have one set of Admins for all domains. No
such thing as splitting up a forest securely among admins for different
domains.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lou Vega Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Let's say I have a domain
called DomainA.com and now my organization is talking with another organization
who would like to have DomainB.com. Management at both organizations would like
"pretty seamless" access to each other's resources while maintaining their own
identities...i.e, DomainB does not want to be DomainB.DomainA.com.
My first thoughts are to have a forest with both
domains in it (Forest containing DomainA.com and DomainB.com)...but how
easy/hard is that to implement when DomainA.com already exists and you need to
create/add DomainB.com to the forest?
I'm stepping into new territory here and would
appreciate any suggestions, comments etc. concerning this. I'm researching this
on the web and I know from past discussions on this list that I'm bound to learn
something new here! If you need more info, let me know.
r/
Lou
|
- [ActiveDir] Domains in a Forest Lou Vega
- RE: [ActiveDir] Domains in a Forest Joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] Domains in a Forest Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Domains in a Forest deji
- Re: [ActiveDir] Domains in a Forest Lou Vega
