|
DIT size decreases are certainly what I am
seeing in the field, with an 80,000 user AD I deal with shrinking in a similar
fashion to the Compaq/HP one described below… Surely some people on here will be able to
explain the shrinkage…. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad According to Tony Redmond's Exchange 2003
book, the HP/Compaq combined DIT file was 12GB in AD on Win2k and dropped to
7GB under 2003. Not sure how typical that is. I'd think worst case you'd end up about
the same place you are now. IIRC, there aren't that many schema changes, so the
structural size shouldn't change that much. Roger --------------------------------------------------------------
|
Title: Message
- [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT size Parker, Edward
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... Joe Baguley
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT... Cristian Zaharia
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... Robbie Allen \(rallen\)
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... Bernard, Aric
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... GRILLENMEIER,GUIDO (HP-Germany,ex1)
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... Jef Kazimer
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... Free, Bob
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 NTDS.DIT siz... Jef Kazimer
