Joe, thanks for the post reply.

first about the dns registrations - will put this right on Mon AM - i have
misread the article (Authentication Topology, authored by Gil Fitzpatrick)
used as reference for this technique

- the article quotes to add all mnemonics except DcByGuid - this was
subsequently corrected to DSAcName

am just wondering whether this error would be suffcient to cause the
observed behaviour - my suspicion is not and that my admin of the site link
configuration is not correct.

to answer directly your qu 1

it is set currently to a value of 1440 (1 day) -  the value being required
as no of minutes.- the intended interval is 5 days and this is a step to
test the modification of replication interval

if i read your 2nd qu correct you are checking to see if this change to the
site configuration has reached the "slow replication partner" - to check
this i set the focus of AD sites and services to the slow replication
partner which does have in fact have the revised correct value of 1440

i thought that the KCC (which runs on by default every 15 mins on win2k)
would run on the slow replication partner to enumerate its replication
schedule - and no further administrative action needs to be taken ???

 this appears not the case but then i guess we need to put the
DnsAvoidRegisterRecords config right first to get any sort of "normal"
behaviour - will advise subseqeuent to this change

this begs the question of how would an admin view the "net" replication
schedule of a particular server to enumerate the time when next it will
replicate - I guess it could be inferred from a previous replication time
(as in repadmin) and the site link configuration (which just defines an
interval)  - it just seems to me that a view of the actual replication
schedule would be helpful ?

GT

.. "
----- Original Message -----
From: "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 1:26 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] slow replication partner / site link config


> Howdy Graham.
>
> This is something that is near to my heart right now as I am working out a
> similar thing for our DR utilizing some virtualization software - we are
> testing virtual server for this.
>
> Let me pop a couple of the questions here...
>
> The question regarding the DNSAvoidRegisterRecords seeming to be
additional
> unneeded step. The point behind this should be to remove the records from
> the generic zones of the domain (and forest if this is a GC). Even though
> you are in a specific site there are cases where these DCs could still be
> hit by clients. Those cases being a machine that isn't in a defined subnet
> (I recommend a high level definition even up to being an 8 bit definition
to
> direct these to a known site like a hub) or when the normally correct DC
> isn't responding properly to requests.
>
> I don't think that DSACName is the record you want to stop publishing
> though. The clients don't use that record to my knowledge. That is used by
> other DCs to find the DC for replication purposes. That is one you would
> want to be registered unless something is registering it otherwise on your
> behalf. Without that record in DNS, DCs won't be able connect to that DC
to
> pull changes.
>
> I believe the records you want to prevent getting published are:
>
> LdapIpAddress
> Ldap
> DcByGuid
> Kdc
> Dc
> Rfc1510Kdc
> Rfc1510UdpKdc
> Rfc1510Kpwd
> Rfc1510UdpKpwd
>
> If it is a GC the following as well
>
> Gc
> GcIpAddress
> GenericGc
>
>
> That list may be more extensive than is needed but seems to catch all of
the
> non-site specific records, if you have machines in the same site you may
> even want to kill the site specific ones.
>
>
>
> The second part of your post indicates that the server isn't replicating
on
> the extended frequency you have set. The questions I have around this are
>
> 1. What is the frequency you have set?
>
> 2. Do you see it listed as a change notification partner on any of the DCs
> in the Enterprise when looking at the partners via repadmin? Or do you see
> it listing any DCs as change notification partners for it?
>
> I have been successful at setting longer replication periods up to almost
a
> week long (Greater than that and it seems to ignore the schedule).
>
>
>  joe
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graham Turner
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 5:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] slow replication partner / site link config
>
> a server has been joined to the AD infrastructure and promoted to DC for
the
> specific purpose of recovery of AD objects.
>
> the intention is to configure the replication topology following what
seems
> to be termed as "lazy replication partner" model.
>
> to this end the following tasks have been completed;
>
> it is connected to a subnet on which there are no other AD hosts a site /
> subnet has been defined site link linking it to a hub site defined
>
> netdiag confirms its site membership
>
> the server has been reconfigured with the following registry value -
> "DNSAvoidRegisterRecords" with the data of "DSACname" -
>
> this change is made with the intention of preventing it authenticating any
> logon requests - this would seem to be an additional step given that site
> membership should dictate no clients discover it
>
> once the server ids fully replicant, the site link has been configured
with
> an extended value of the number of hours but yet the "slow" server is
still
> replicating on the normal frequency
>
> it would seem that the "replication topology" has not learnt the
> configuration of the site link to the slow replication site/server.
>
> qu - is this by design and if so do we need to force a refresh of the
> replication topology - is this what repadmin /kcc does ?
>
> GT
>
>
>
>
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to