> I haven't ever seen things just delete themselves out of the 
> directory. I have had sites complain that computers were 
> being mysteriously deleted on occasion though. In the cases I 
> investigated, the number of people who had the rights to do 
> the delete were excessive. I would indicate that they should 
> clean up who had the access to do it and the problems would 
> seemingly clear up.
> 
> On your auditing comment. 
> 
> 1. Do you know for sure your auditing is configured tight 
> enough to catch a computer object deletion. I.E. If you 
> delete one, do you see the audit event (probably be an 
> account management category). 
> 2. Did you scan for the events on every DC and did you have 
> all security events available on every DC for the period of 
> time that you are SURE the computer account existed and it no 
> longer existed.

When i ckecked into event logs, i couldn't find any evidence of manual
deletion from anyone. I have raised the security log size, to make sure that
those events were not overwritten.
And, i believe all audit things are correctly configured to catch account
management events.

Are you sure that the issue is not to be related to replication?

Thanks
 

 

> 
> 
>   joe
> 
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J0mb
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R: [ActiveDir] computer account issues
> 
> Michael,
> 
> Admittely, WAN links are not extremely reliable and tend to 
> be dropped out at times. However, i can't explain how this 
> can be related to my problem.
> Would you like to further explain this point please?
> Can WAN links be related to my problem? Has it something to 
> do with replication? This what it happens: the client, all of 
> a sudden cannot authenticate anymore. We check on the DCs and 
> the computer account is gone...lost, as if someone deleted it 
> (but auditings show no sign of manual deletions from 
> privileged users). We have at least 2 DCs at each site and we 
> verified that each client will authenticate from a DC in its 
> local site.
> Each site has its own DCs and i verified that each client 
> will authenticate from the correct DC in its own site. From 
> my point of view, it doesn't look like a WAN links issue.
> 
> As for architectural changes: they can't be performed for a 
> number of reasons. Hovever i still wonder how this issue may 
> be related to WAN traffic.
> 
> Thanks for your time
> Alex.
> 
> 
> > -----Messaggio originale-----
> > Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Michael 
> > Wassell
> > Inviato: venerd� 6 febbraio 2004 16.25
> > A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Oggetto: RE: [ActiveDir] computer account issues
> > 
> > >From reading the detailed error messages it would seem that
> > the workstations are timing out for one reason or another when 
> > synchronizing, you may want to research increasing timeout 
> values for 
> > network services (Browser service, Server service etc.).  
> Also, have 
> > you attempted to verify server communication via the WAN links to 
> > verify that there are no timeout issues occuring?  Try 
> pinging with an 
> > -l switch to increase the ICMP data being sent with the -t 
> switch and 
> > watch for any timeouts or significant ping response time increases.
> > 
> > Something you might want to consider is implementing 
> independent child 
> > domains for each of your sites.  I believe it would significantly 
> > decrease your network traffic across your WAN links to 
> allow for more 
> > prioritized processing of network traffic to take place.  However, 
> > that would likely be a large project so a more temporary solution 
> > would be to determine the cause of the current issue.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J0mb
> > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:00 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: R: [ActiveDir] computer account issues
> > 
> >  thanks for reply and sorry for being unclear.
> > The eventID 5723 as per my previous post is generated on the domain 
> > controller.
> > These are the events generated on the client side: (please 
> note they 
> > were translated from a non-english system, hopefully they're clear
> > enough:
> > 
> > Source: LSASRV
> > Category: SPNEGO
> > EventID: 40961
> > Protection System could not establish a secured connection 
> with server 
> > cifs/dc.domain.local. No authentication protocol was available
> > 
> > Source: NETLOGON
> > Category: None
> > EventID: 5721
> > Session installation on Windows NT or Windows 2000 domain 
> controller 
> > \\dc.domain.local was unsuccesful because domain controller has no 
> > computer account for the computer "computername"
> > 
> > Source: W32time
> > Category: none
> > EventID: 18
> > NtpClient time provider was unable to establish a trust 
> relation from 
> > this machine to domain domain.local in order to syncronize time in 
> > protected mode. Trust relation between this workstation and the 
> > primary domain was unsuccesful (0x800706FD).
> > 
> > One of the DCs has a SQL server to support a SMS 2.0 
> installation but 
> > i can't figure any interactions with a client authentication.
> > I am about to thoroughly read the Q article you suggested me. 
> > From a quick check, the only relevant policy i could find is 
> > "microsoft network server:
> > digitally sign up communication if client agrees" set 
> ENABLED on the 
> > default DC policy.
> > I have been working on this issue for a short time. People working 
> > here for longer says this might have happened exclusively 
> (or mainly) 
> > on winXP workstations, but take this as an unreliable piece of 
> > information.
> > Please let me know if you need more detailed information. I 
> appreciate 
> > your support.
> > Thanks!!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Messaggio originale-----
> > > Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Michael 
> > > Wassell
> > > Inviato: venerd� 6 febbraio 2004 15.09
> > > A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Oggetto: RE: [ActiveDir] computer account issues
> > > 
> > > A little bit unclear, but I have browsed through the Microsoft KB 
> > > regarding that event id and this article was a match.
> > > 
> > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;823659
> > > 
> > > Search in the page for "5723" (without quotes).  It is under the 
> > > digitally sign communication (always) category.  That may
> > be a first
> > > step to determining the cause?
> > > 
> > > I also noticed that this error can be generated by SQL Server.
> > > 
> > > Is this error being generated in the event log on the server? 
> > >  Or on the machine itself? 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J0mb
> > > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 8:43 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [ActiveDir] computer account issues
> > > 
> > > good morning list,
> > > 
> > > I am getting a weird problem lately. Our AD architecture is
> > made of 1
> > > forest, 1 domain, 4 sites spanned through WAN links. There
> > are approx.
> > > 2500 nodes in the forest, there are 2 DCs at each site, a DC is 
> > > configured as GC at each site.
> > > 
> > > Randomly, with no apparent recurrent pattern, we get the eventID
> > > 5723(netlogon) error from some machines (i would say some
> > 4-5 a day). 
> > > 
> > > ------------------
> > > 
> > > The session setup from the computer <computer name> 
> failed because 
> > > there is no trust account in the security database for this
> > computer.
> > > The name of the account referenced in the security database is 
> > > <computer name>$.
> > > 
> > > The error code is 0xC000018B
> > > 
> > > ------------------
> > > 
> > > The client is not able to authenticate to the DC anymore. 
> > The only (to
> > > me) known resolution is to rejoin the machine to the domain.
> > > 
> > > Would anyone suggest me a resolution, or correct steps for 
> > > troubleshooting?
> > > 
> > > I've already checked on eventid.net, and looks like none of the 
> > > suggestion is relevant with my architecture. We're 
> running a native 
> > > mode windows 2000 domain.
> > > 
> > > The error code states that the computer account has been
> > deleted. How
> > > can it this happen? How can i audit operation attempts on 
> computer 
> > > accounts?
> > > 
> > > Thanks!!
> > > 
> > > Alex
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive: 
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > 
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to