It is actually a per-user assignment in a Windows 2003 domain.  So, I
have configured it to install at log on as you had mentioned Darren.

What this particular application does is install a button on the toolbar
of Outlook to access a form that has been published in our Exchange
environment.  Fairly simple thing, but unfortunately due to the nature
there is no file extension associated with the installer, only few .dlls
and registry keys that create a button.

As I had said, it does install successfully in the test environment with
the exact same settings.  For some reason, but for some reason it has
been giving me a HECK of a lot of grief in the production environment
and unfortuantely that's what matters :-(

What I may end up doing is publishing the application with "Basic" UI
(this has been tested succesfully in production env.) and instructing
users to open their control panel and click "Add".  I have taken this
approach with other applications by restricting Control Panel to only
have access to A/R Programs and only have the Add New Programs tab
available restricted to Add Programs from your Network.  But for some
reason the boss frowns on it although the only user interaction is
physically clicking the "Add" button and closing A/R Programs & Control
Panel afterwards (I think a monkey could do that???).  

I appreciate the advise though.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Assigned software deployment via GPO

Michael-
Are you doing per-user assignment or per-machine? In general, if you do
a per-user assignment, the application is only "advertised" for install
on first use at logon, rather than fully installed. The exception to
this is that software installation policy in W2K3 supports a new option
on user assignment called "install this application at logon" that will
do a full install. That's probably the reason that the event log is
saying that the app was successfully installed--it probably was! The way
you can confirm this is if this app you've advertised supports any kind
of file association or if it puts icons in the Start Menu, you should
see those showing up. That is, if you were to open a file or click a
shortcut that was associated to this advertised app, that would kick off
the application installation at that time.

Darren

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Wassell
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Assigned software deployment via GPO

Yes actually I was.  

I have done other tests using different machines, but that particular
test I used the same machine for.  I will try it using a different
machine.  I did force the GPO to uninstall the assigned application from
the previous GPO (eventhough it hadn't actually been installed, but
shown in the event log), but it is still worth a try I suppose.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Assigned software deployment via GPO


Are you testing it on the same PC in the Production OU that you used in
the Test OU?

-Peter


 

                      "Michael Wassell"

                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

                      om>                            cc:

                      Sent by:                       Subject:
[ActiveDir] Assigned software deployment via GPO

                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                      tivedir.org

 

 

                      04/06/2004 02:55 PM

                      Please respond to

                      ActiveDir

 





Okay guys, I am at my wit's end here....

I've been trying to distribute an .MSI package via GPO as an Assigned
application to an OU in AD.

Test environment:  Worked perfectly fine in my test environment, I
copied the install package to a share on the server, set permissions,
assigned the application to a GPO and that was it.  Worked perfectly
ever since.

Production environment:  Exact replica of permissions, shared folder
names, the file is the same, the usernames/security groups are different
and the name/properties of the GPO used to deploy the application are
different.
Will not work for the life of me.

Thinking that it might be a problem with the GPO I created a test OU and
blocked inheritance (without linking any other GPO's), test user
account, test GPO and assigned the application in the new GPO,
redeployed the application.  Still no go.  The deployment works fine if
the application is published, but my boss wants 0 user interaction (I.E.
install at logon).

The weirdest thing is that the event viewer shows that the application
is installed successfully, but it isnt actually installed anywhere (no
registry keys, or program files etc.).  Which makes no sense because it
works perfectly in the test environment.

This should be something that is very simple but it has been the biggest
pain in the NECK!!! (for lack of a better term)

Anyone with any idea's, I'm ALL ears :-)



List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to