It would more likely be DNS if this were happening on boot-up. But he says this happens on resumption from a locked state. More likely to be AV or powersaving issue.
Sincerely,
D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
www.akomolafe.com
www.iyaburo.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
www.akomolafe.com
www.iyaburo.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: Bruce Clingaman
Sent: Mon 4/19/2004 6:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] (OT?) Slow resume from computer Lock
I did not mean to imply my antivirus was related to DNS. The av would do scans and updates at unexpected times. Your problem looks like a DNS issue. Compare the settings between clients that are slow to those that are not. Using DHCP? Is their dns entry being updated? Firewall? Proxy? .... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J0mb Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 8:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: R: [ActiveDir] (OT?) Slow resume from computer Lock Bruce, I did dozens of tests, some of which involved disabling antivirus software. How were DNS and antivirus related in your case? Thank you > > It does look like a DNS issue. My antivirus software has caused these > symptoms on my network. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J0mb > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 3:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ActiveDir] (OT?) Slow resume from computer Lock > > This might be OT, if so i apologize. > On my AD network, i have some clients needing a lot of time to resume > from a computer lock. A user types his/her credentials to unlock and > must wait 40-60 seconds before the desktop would be displayed. Using > alternate credentials than the logged on user makes no difference. > This is happening on some 10-12 WinXP machines out of 500. Win2000 and > Non-Domain members clients seems not affected. I couldn't determine > whether this might be related to a domain issue. Thanks all. > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > > List info : > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
